PawSwap Network - Layer 3 Blockchain for DeFi

Aggregate liquidity, minimize slippage, and execute safer swaps across EVM chains. PawSwap routes orders intelligently via AMMs and RFQ makers, with optional MEV-aware protections, limit orders, and DCA.

EVM Chains Smart Order Routing RFQ Liquidity Limit Orders DCA MEV-Aware
Open PawSwap →

PawSwap Overview: Architecture & Execution Model

PawSwap is a non-custodial, smart-order-routing layer designed to search across AMMs and RFQ makers to deliver competitive, effective prices (output after fees, slippage, and gas). The router evaluates multiple paths (single-hop, multi-hop, split-order) and can request firm or indicative quotes from integrated market makers, selecting the route that maximizes expected value under your slippage bound.

Core Components

What “Best Execution” Means in Practice

“Best execution” is not just highest quoted output; it’s the balance of:

MEV-Aware Flow

PawSwap supports an MEV-aware workflow: tight slippage, optional private/builder RPCs (where available), and order-splitting for larger trades. This reduces exposure to sandwiching and adverse selection.

Security, Trust Boundaries & Operational Safety

PawSwap is non-custodial: swaps settle directly on-chain to your wallet. Still, routing and approvals carry risks. The design principle is minimize trust in off-chain components and surface all costs/approvals explicitly.

Key Safety Practices

Threat Model & Mitigations

Power Features for Traders & Integrators

Smart Order Routing

The router evaluates single-hop (A→B), multi-hop (A→WETH→B), and split-route executions (A→B across multiple pools) to minimize price impact and slippage. Routes are scored on expected output net of gas and fees.

RFQ (Request-For-Quote)

For larger sizes or illiquid pairs, connected market makers can return firm quotes for a given size/time window. If the RFQ is better than AMM paths after gas, the router selects it; otherwise, it falls back to AMMs.

Limit Orders & DCA (if enabled in your UI)

Cross-Chain Options

PawSwap focuses on same-chain best execution. For cross-chain, use reputable bridges/routers (or integrated partners where available), then execute locally via PawSwap to optimize entry/exit pricing.

Developer Notes

Execution Quality Metrics (What to Track)

Practical Runbook: Getting Best Results

Before You Swap

Slippage & Gas Tips

Troubleshooting Matrix

Frequently Asked Questions

How is PawSwap different from using a single DEX?

Single DEX = single pool/pricing source. PawSwap aggregates AMMs and RFQ makers, evaluates net outcome (after gas/fees), and can split across venues to lower price impact—especially important on larger trades or thin markets.

What chains and tokens are supported?

PawSwap targets major EVM chains (e.g., Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon, BNB Chain, Base, Avalanche). Token availability depends on each chain’s liquidity and integrations. Always verify contract addresses in explorers.

How do I reduce MEV and failed transactions?
  • Use tight but realistic slippage; prefer private/builder RPC where available.
  • Trade outside peak volatility; consider RFQ for size.
  • Split large orders; increase gas priority to reduce mempool time.
Do limit orders and DCA require custody?

No custody by PawSwap. Orders are created via smart contracts or off-chain watchers; settlement happens on-chain to your wallet when the condition is met. Always review the specific UI’s implementation details and permissions.

Why did my realized output differ from the quote?

Markets move and liquidity shifts. Gas, pool fees, RFQ validity windows, and inclusion time all affect realized output. Track your effective price (net of all costs) to compare routes fairly.